Sports Law Blog |
All things legal relating to the sports world... |
|
Main Page
Atom Feed RSS Feed Honored by Fast Company as one of Three Best Sports Business Blogs and by the American Bar Association Journal as a Top 100 Law Blog Contributors Rick Karcher Michael McCann Geoffrey Rapp Greg Skidmore Howard Wasserman Guest Contributors Mark Conrad andre douglas pond cummings Marc Edelman Ed Edmonds Timothy Epstein Gabriel Feldman Stijn Francis Paul Haberman David Katz Alan C. Milstein Other Guests Sports Law Blog (one word) -at- gmail -dot- com Recent Posts Defaming or Fitting? The Bobcats Release of Kareem... MLS: Reflections on the League’s Appeal to the Mex... Justice Scalia to Speak at Mississippi College Sch... Nospace: Is MySpace Inappropriate for Student Athl... The Grass Was Always Greener: Red Sox Make Progres... A Market Solution to Baseball’s “Asterisk” Problem... Empirical Study on how NCAA and Member Schools Pro... Should Sports Teams be Owned by Public Corporation... David Ortiz: Overpaid or Rewarded? NBA: No Men in Tights Our Publications Rick Karcher's Law Review Articles on SSRN Michael McCann's Law Review Articles on SSRN Michael McCann's SI.com Columns Geoffrey Rapp's Law Review Articles on SSRN Greg Skidmore's A Proposal to Pay College Athletes and the Impending Conflict with Title IX Howard Wasserman's Law Review Articles on SSRN Our Social Network Pages  View Michael McCann's LinkedIn Profile
Sports Blogs & Links ACC BasketBlog AOL NBA Fanhouse Baseball Crank Baseball Musings BasketBloom Beaneball Big East Basketball Report Bioethics and Sport Blog Maverick Blog a Bull Boston Dirt Dogs Boston Sports Media Watch Celtics Blog Celtics Stuff Live Chris Isidore/CNN Money College Basketball Blog College Athletics Clips Darren Rovell's Gatorade Blog Darren Rovell's SportsBiz Deadspin Don Walker's Bus.-Sports Blog DraftExpress Duke Basketball Report ESPN Federal Baseball Hoya News I Heart Celtics Ian On Sports Infinite Intensity Jones On The NBA Just Another Blog on Sports Keeping Score: The Media and Women's Sports Legal Issues-College Athletics National Football Post NBA Draft Net Only Baseball Matters Off Wing Opinion Playbooks and Profits Remember Black Baseball Sabernomics Sports Blog Sports Business Daily Sports Business News Sports Central Sports Court Sports Crumedgeon Sports Filter Sports Illustrated Sports Judge Sports Media Review Sports Overload Sports Policy Blog Sports Prof Teal Sunglasses The Sports Economist True Hoop True Hoop ESPN USA Rugby Blog Women's Hoops Blog Zagsblog (Adam Zagoria) Sports Law Resources ABA Forum on Sports All Sports Agents Directory Athlete Agent Blog Connecticut Sports Law Denver Sports Ent. L.J. DePaul J. Sports L. Duke Center Sports Law/Policy Duke Sports & Ent. L. Society Find Law Sports FIU Sports & Entertainment Law Florida Coastal Center for Law and Sports Florida Coastal Database of College Coaches Contracts History of Sports and the Human Condition I Want to be a Sports Agent Illinois J. Bus. L. Society Lex Sportiva (Portugese) LII: Sports (Cornell University) Marquette Sports Law Program Mark Alesia's NCAA Study National Sports and Entertainment Law Society National Sports and Entertainment Law Society Blog Orpheus Sports and Entertainment Seton Hall J. Sports & Ent. L. Sports Law Review Sports Lawyers Assoc. Sports Litigation Alert Texas Rev. Ent. & Sports L. The Sports Lawyers Journal Title IX Blog Vanderbilt J. Ent. & Tech. L. Vermont Law School Sports and Entertainment Law Society Villanova Sports & Ent. L. J. Virginia Sports & Ent. L. J. Willamette Sports L. J. World Sports Law Report Law Blogs Antitrust Review Concurring Opinions Conglomerate Contracts Prof Blog Crim Prof Blog Crime and Federalism En Passant Franchise Law Blog Houston's Clear Thinkers How Appealing Inside Legal Blogs JD2B Law and Letters Law Career Blog LawCulture Legal Theory Blog Madisonian.Net Media Law Prof Blog MoneyLaw Neuroethics and Law Blog Overlawyered Harvard Law Professor Paul Weiler's Blog Real Lawyers :: Have Blogs Sex Crimes Law Blog Southern California Law Blog Sports Law Professor Supreme Court Blog Taxonomy of Legal Blogs TaxProf Blog The Legal Scoop The Situationist Trademark Blog Truth on the Market Volokh Conspiracy Wall Street Journal Law Blog Workplace Prof Blog Other Links Blog Search Engine Chris Uggen (Sociology Blog) Economics Roundtable Filsteu Florida Coastal School of Law Fuss is Human-Rant is Divine! Google Blog Search Harvard Business Sports Club Harvard Law Record Inside Higher Education Journeys of Jack Tripper Market Power Mississippi Coll. School of Law New Scientist Picks and Policy SSRN Technorati The Metropolis Times Univ. of Toledo College of Law Washington Monthly Wordsmith's Dance Disclaimer Information contained on this site is for informational or amusement purposes only. Nothing written is intended to be legal advice or legal counsel. All original work is protected by applicable copyright laws. Thank you. < ? law blogs # > Archives 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 05/01/2008 - 06/01/2008 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008 07/01/2008 - 08/01/2008 08/01/2008 - 09/01/2008 09/01/2008 - 10/01/2008 10/01/2008 - 11/01/2008 11/01/2008 - 12/01/2008 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009 01/01/2009 - 02/01/2009 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009 03/01/2009 - 04/01/2009 04/01/2009 - 05/01/2009 05/01/2009 - 06/01/2009 06/01/2009 - 07/01/2009 07/01/2009 - 08/01/2009 
Blogarama |
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Down with the Count: Do Weigh-In Procedures Actually Endanger Boxer Safety   It goes without saying that the boxing is a dangerous sport. In 1997, Congress enacted the Professional Boxing Safety Act, 15 USC §6301 et seq., which mandates physical examinations of boxers before competition, ambulances on-site and certification from a medical doctor that the boxer is physically able to compete. State boxing commissions have much more detailed rules regarding boxing competitions, including detailed weigh in procedures. If fighters do not meet their weight, the commission requires corrective action to be taken and may prohibit the fight from taking place if the weight disparity is too great. See Nev. Admin. Code §467.476(2), §467.522. Nevada also limits fighters on losing additional weight after weigh-in. Nev. Admin. Code. §467.476(3). In 2000, the Boxing Task Force of the National Association of Attorneys General recommended that commissions require two separate weigh-ins to occur seven days and eight hours before the fight. Additionally, the Task Force recommends the commission limit the amount of weight a fighter can lose in the interim.While the Boxing Commissions have regulated on the basis of losing weight surrounding weigh-ins, real dangers come from boxers who meet their contract weight at the weigh-in, but then gain weight prior to the bout. As noted by L. Jon Wertheim in last week’s Sports Illustrated (When a fighter packs on 20 pounds after the weigh-in, two people can get hurt, Sports Illustrated, April 3, 2006), as a follow-up to a story from the March 27, 2000 issue by Hoffer, Lidz, and Llosa (Inside Boxing), it is common practice for boxers to dehydrate themselves prior to weigh-ins, and then put the weight back on after weigh-in by rehydrating thru a variety of methods as simple as drinking water and as complex as blood transfusions and IV injections. When one boxer uses this technique and the other does not, then boxing matches can take place with weight differences at levels that state commissions have deemed otherwise dangerous and prohibited. In a February 2000 junior-welterweight bout (one of six bouts before a fight between de la Hoya and Derrell Cooley at Madison Square Garden), Joey Gamache and Arturo Gatti each met their 141 pound weight requirement eight hours before their fight. Thereafter, Gatti, using a rehydration strategy, ballooned to 160 pounds. Gamache did not use this strategy and fought at 145 pounds. HBO weighed both boxers prior to their fight, but the results were immaterial according to the governing rules. The fight was stopped after lasting only 20 seconds into the second round. Gamache was allegedly left with severe and permanent neurological injuries that ended his boxing career. Gamache initially filed suit against Gatti and New Jersey Sports Productions, Inc. with a demand of $10 million, which was voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiff. On February 26, 2006, the matter was refilled in the Southern District of New York (06 CV 1338) before Judge Laura Taylor Swain (check PACER for a copy). The suit alleges that Gatti and New Jersey Sports Productions, Inc. breached the contract for the fight as Gamache “failed to satisfy the maximum weight limit requirement set forth in the contract,” and as a result Gamache lost the fight, was hospitalized for two days, and has ongoing pain and suffering. The complaint also includes a loss of consortium claim by Sissy Gamache, Joey’s wife. State Commissions have allegedly given this issue a priority in their July meeting, so what should be done? Should the Commissions adopt standards to address the concern of weight gain, as opposed to weight loss, prior to competition? Should boxers be prohibited from using these techniques? Should medical examinations be tailored to address hydration issues? The simple solution would seem to require fighters to meet a contract weight moments before their fight, but this has been abandoned due to rapid dehydration techniques that would leave fighters dangerously dehydrated prior to a bout. Hat tip: to uber law clerk, Jim Ryan, for his help researching this. 6 Comments:
In a sport where one competitior has the slightest advantage over the other, can mean the difference between a win and loss, should have universal standards that allow for fighters to be on the same playing field. This situation, if not, almost creates a competitive imbalance, which is not healthy for the sport.
Wow, what a shocker...something in boxing is screwed up. The truly shocking thing is that in that same article, the author cited a study that indicated that a boxer who gained a significant amount of weight between the weigh in and the fight was in fact LESS likely to win than one who didn't. It would seem that the fact is that not only is this practice exceedingly dangerous, it may actually put a fighter at a disadvantage do to the physiological strain he puts on his body.
While some fighters do box "above" their weight, added pounds can mean more power behind a punch, and maybe more important, better ability to withstand an opponent's blow.
Hi. It's the Professional Boxing Safety Act, but an honest mistake. Just fyi.
Corrected. Thanks.
thank you
|
