Sports Law Blog |
All things legal relating to the sports world... |
|
Monday, October 11, 2010
Fallout for Brett Favre's Endorsement Deal with Wrangler CNBC's Darren Rovell looks at how Wrangler, which has paid Brett Favre millions for his endorsement and for his appearances in a wide-range of All-American type ads, often with footballs and dogs and pick-up trucks, might respond to allegations indicating that Favre, who has been married for 14 years with two children, may have sent inappropriate messages and photos to another woman.Here is Rovell: * * * I spoke to a couple people yesterday who were surprised that Brett Favre’s Wrangler jeans spots were still running. Surprised that he was still on their Web site. They were surprised that Wrangler had no comment.To read the rest, click here. Quick legal point: Should Wrangler seek to get out of its endorsement contract with Favre, the wording of the morals clause in that contract will likely play a major factor. If it is expansively worded--such as covering all types of conduct that is publicly reprehensible, at least as deemed by Wrangler--that helps Wrangler; if it is narrowly worded--such as requiring that the Favre commit a crime--that helps to protect Favre. 4 Comments:
Although I think the story is all smoke and mirrors, it will be interesting to see what ramifications come from it; specifically, as you said, how this changes the relationship between Wrangler and Favre. Obviously, the language in the contract will be very important, but I think Wrangler should be wary of breaking their association with Favre.
hey visit www.sportsdhamal.com and get all sport and sporty information
Do you want to choose a high quality battery?I can give you some advice.you should Select the battery that made from the Japanese or Korean Li-ion battery cells.Purchase the hp battery only when it is necessary Some of our items have additional option of higher capacity Choose the higher one if there is quality.
This, Howard Wasserman, is how you discuss Brett Favre's situation: don't rush to judgment like you always do. Discuss the legal issues, present facts like McCann. Otherwise you consistently come across as an extremist (which you are) and you keep destroying your own credibility in sports law circles and come across as a clown.
|