Sports Law Blog
All things legal relating
to the sports world...
Tuesday, August 27, 2013
 
Fixed matches and cultural capital

A new article in ESPN The Magazine (which includes the embedded video report) tells the story of rumors that Bobby Riggs tanked the famous "Battle of the Sexes" tennis match against Billie Jean King, which was played 40 years ago next month. The touchstone of the article is an interview with a man who claims to have overheard two mob bosses and a mob lawyer discussing Riggs' plan, although rumors that Riggs threw the match have abounded for 40 years.

Two notable things in the article. First, two people suggested that Riggs' famous pre-match chauvinism was all for show, that he believed in gender equality and had worked with a female coach at the start of his career. Second, the story ends with Riggs and King speaking several days before Riggs died in 1995; King says she told Riggs how important their match was to women and the women's movement. "'"Well, we did it," Bobby Riggs finally told her. "We really made a difference, didn't we?""

What if Riggs did tank? The match is a cultural milestone because it purported to show that women could successfully compete with men. That idea is absolutely true, of course (although not in professional sports, and I wish the sports conversation would move away from women competing with men so we could enjoy women's sports on their own merits). But the match no longer represents the idea if King did not actually beat Riggs. On the other hand, suppose Riggs tanked because he saw that he could advance the cause of women's right and women's equality (ideas to which he actually was sympathetic) by losing. Regardless of whether the win was real, it laid the groundwork for what we now, 40 years on, understand as true. And his dying words to King suggest he may have understood that.





4 Comments:

Since Riggs had only 1 serve to BJK's 2
And Riggs had to defend the Doubles Court vs BJK defending the standard singles court
The rules were "rigged"
Riggs had badly beaten Margaret Court previous to the BJK match and Court was at least BJK's equal at the time
Great circus either but hardly on the level in any event

Blogger Yorgo49 -- 8/28/2013 11:14 PM  


Since Riggs had only 1 serve to BJK's 2
And Riggs had to defend the Doubles Court vs BJK defending the standard singles court
The rules were "rigged"
Riggs had badly beaten Margaret Court previous to the BJK match and Court was at least BJK's equal at the time
Great circus either but hardly on the level in any event

Blogger Yorgo49 -- 8/28/2013 11:15 PM  


Remember Riggs only was allowed 1 serve while BJK got the normal 2
Plus Riggs had to defend the doubles court with BJK defending only the standard singles court
In other words, the Match was rigged from the beginning
Riggs had just beaten Margaret Court and Margaret was BJK's equal at the time
The whole thing was a Sham

Blogger Yorgo49 -- 8/29/2013 12:56 PM  


What you say (three times, even) is patently and utterly false, a rumor that has spread on the interwebs in recent years. In fact, one indication that Riggs was tanking, according to the ESPN story, is that Riggs had several double faults and had like a 50 % first-serve percentage, both unusual in his game. But both statistics show that he got two serves.

Blogger Howard Wasserman -- 8/29/2013 10:14 PM  


Post a Comment